How to Write a Seminar Response in English With a Specific Claim

Many seminar responses sound responsible and empty at the same time. They move carefully through the reading, repeat the major claims, mention that the topic is complex, and stop there. Nothing is false. Nothing is really being said. For international students, summary feels safe because it seems less risky than staking out a position in imperfect English. The problem is that a response paper usually matters precisely because it shows where your thinking catches, resists, or extends the text.

Revision should begin with one sentence that could survive discussion. Maybe the author’s example is weaker than the conclusion suggests. Maybe the key concept is being used too broadly. Maybe the method creates a limit the argument never fully admits. The claim does not need to be dramatic. It does need to be specific. Without that center, every quoted idea becomes another note copied into cleaner English.

After the claim is visible, build the paragraph in a simple sequence: state the response, point to one detail from the reading, explain why that detail matters, then leave the reader with a question or unresolved edge. That movement feels closer to live seminar thinking. Easydue can help reduce translated phrasing and overpacked transitions, but it cannot decide what your response actually is. That pressure still belongs to you.